Enterprise-Grade Java ↔ .NET Integration
In-process. Type-safe. Production-proven.
Java 8-25 Support
Full support for legacy Java 8 through modern Java 25. Backward compatible—run Java 8 bytecode on Java 17 JVM seamlessly.
Learn more →Native Performance
In-process JNI-based communication. Zero marshalling overhead. 50%+ faster than REST/gRPC for large payloads.
Benchmarks →Cyber-Safe by Design
No network channels, no attack surface. Both runtimes in same process with complete memory isolation.
Security details →Type-Safe APIs
Strongly-typed wrappers for all Java/NET APIs. Full IntelliSense support. Compile-time error checking.
See examples →How It Works
In-Process Integration via JNI
JCOBridge uses pure JNI (Java Native Interface) for bidirectional communication between .NET and JVM. Both runtimes exist in the same process, each executing native code at full speed.
Why This Matters:
- ✅ Zero Marshalling: Objects remain in their native runtime—no serialization overhead
- ✅ Zero Network Latency: No REST APIs, no gRPC, no network stack
- ✅ Memory Efficient: Direct pointer references, not data copies
- ✅ Type Safe: Strongly-typed wrappers at compile time
vs Alternative Approaches:
| Approach | Performance | Complexity | Security |
|---|---|---|---|
| JCOBridge (JNI) | 🟢 Native | 🟢 Low | 🟢 No Attack Surface |
| REST APIs | 🔴 10-100x slower | 🟡 Medium | 🔴 Network exposed |
| gRPC | 🟡 3-10x slower | 🟡 Medium | 🔴 Network exposed |
| Custom Channels | 🟡 Varies | 🔴 High | 🔴 Attack surface |
🆕 Java 8-25 Support
Full Version Coverage
JCOBridge supports all major Java versions from Java 8 (2014) through Java 25 (2025).
| Java Version | Release Year | Support Status |
|---|---|---|
| Java 8 (LTS) | 2014 | ✅ NEW Fully Supported |
| Java 11 (LTS) | 2018 | ✅ Fully Supported |
| Java 17 (LTS) | 2021 | ✅ Fully Supported |
| Java 21 (LTS) | 2023 | ✅ Fully Supported |
| Java 25 (LTS) | 2025 | ✅ Fully Supported |
Extended Support: Oracle provides Java 8 Extended Support until December 2030. Free alternatives (Amazon Corretto, Azul Zulu) provide long-term updates.
Backward Compatibility
Mix Java Versions Seamlessly
┌─────────────────────────────┐
│ Java 17 JVM │
│ │
│ ✅ Java 8 bytecode │ ← Legacy code
│ ✅ Java 11 bytecode │ ← Mid-tier code
│ ✅ Java 17 bytecode │ ← Modern code
│ │
│ All work together! │
└─────────────────────────────┘
Key insight: Newer JVMs run older bytecode. Use Java 17 JVM and your Java 8 libraries will work without any code changes.
Example: Mixed Java Versions
// .NET application using Java 17 JVM
// Call legacy Java 8 library
var legacyValidator = new com.company.LegacyLib(); // Java 8
legacyValidator.Validate(data); // ✅ Works!
// Call modern Java 17 library
var modernService = new com.company.ModernLib(); // Java 17
modernService.Process(data); // ✅ Works!
// Both in same process, zero migration needed!
⚡ Performance Characteristics
Method Call Overhead
vs pure Java or pure .NET calls
Typical: 10-20 nanoseconds per callLarge Data Transfer
vs REST/gRPC for payloads >10KB
Zero-copy via native pointersMemory Footprint
for reference tracking layer
Minimal overhead for integrationLatency
vs milliseconds for network calls
1000x faster than RESTWhy So Fast?
1. Zero Marshalling
Objects stay in their native runtime. JCOBridge passes pointer references, not serialized data. This eliminates the biggest performance bottleneck in cross-platform integration.
2. In-Process Communication
No network stack, no TCP/IP overhead, no socket buffers. Direct memory access within the same process address space.
3. Zero-Copy for Large Data
For arrays and byte buffers, JCOBridge uses pinned memory and DirectByteBuffer. The JVM reads directly from .NET memory (and vice versa).
4. JIT Optimizations
Both JVM JIT and .NET JIT can optimize hot paths. The thin JNI layer doesn’t prevent runtime optimizations.
Real-World Performance Examples
| Use Case | Data Size | JCOBridge | REST API | Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Method call (no data) | 0 bytes | ~20 ns | ~1-5 ms | 50,000x faster |
| String parameter | 100 bytes | ~50 ns | ~1-5 ms | 20,000x faster |
| Image processing | 1 MB | ~100 μs | ~10-50 ms | 100-500x faster |
| Kafka message batch | 10 MB | ~1 ms | ~50-200 ms | 50-200x faster |
🔒 Cyber-Safe by Design
✅ JCOBridge Approach
- ✅ No network ports opened
- ✅ No external attack surface
- ✅ Memory isolation between runtimes
- ✅ Standard OS process security applies
- ✅ No custom protocols to secure
⚠️ Network-Based Approaches
┌──────────────┐ Network ┌──────────────┐
│ .NET Process │ ◄──────────────► │ Java Process │
│ │ (Exposed!) │ │
│ Port: 8080 │ │ Port: 8081 │
└──────────────┘ └──────────────┘
↑ ↑
│ │
Attack Attack
Surface Surface
- ❌ Network ports exposed
- ❌ Attack surface created
- ❌ Requires firewall rules
- ❌ Authentication/encryption needed
- ❌ Vulnerable to MITM attacks
Security Benefits
No Network Exposure
Both runtimes exist in the same process. No listening ports, no network traffic, no external exposure.
Reduced Attack Surface
Network-based integration creates attack vectors (port scanning, MITM, DOS). JCOBridge eliminates these entirely.
Simplified Security Model
No need for TLS certificates, authentication tokens, or custom encryption. OS-level process security is sufficient.
Compliance Friendly
Easier to meet security compliance (PCI-DSS, HIPAA, SOC2) when there’s no network communication between components.
Complete API Coverage
Call .NET from Java
✅ Type System
- Load any .NET assembly
- Access all public types
- Generic types fully supported
- Nested types and inner classes
✅ Members
- Instance & static methods
- Properties (get/set)
- Fields (get/set)
- Indexers
- Constructors
✅ Advanced Features
- Delegates and events
- Extension methods
- Nullable reference types
✅ UI Integration
- WPF controls in AWT/Swing
- WinForms in Java UI
- Event handling
- Data binding
Example: Call ML.NET from Java
// Java code calling .NET ML.NET library
import microsoft.ml.*;
import microsoft.ml.data.*;
public class FraudDetector {
public static void main(String[] args) {
// Create ML.NET context
MLContext mlContext = new MLContext();
// Load trained model
ITransformer model = mlContext.Model.Load("fraud-model.zip");
// Make prediction
var engine = mlContext.Model.CreatePredictionEngine(model);
var prediction = engine.Predict(transaction);
System.out.println("Fraud probability: " + prediction.Score);
}
}
Call Java from .NET
✅ Type System
- Load any JAR file
- Access all public classes
- Generic types (List<T>, etc.)
- Inner and anonymous classes
✅ Members
- Instance & static methods
- Fields (get/set)
- Constructors (including varargs)
- Method overloading
✅ Advanced Features
- Functional interfaces (lambdas)
- Streams API
- Exceptions (try-catch)
- Reflection API
- Dynamic code (C# dynamic)
✅ UI Integration
- Swing/AWT in WPF/WinForms
- SWT controls
- Event listeners
Example: Apache Kafka from C#
// C# code calling Apache Kafka Java APIs
using Org.Apache.Kafka.Clients.Producer;
using Java.Util;
public class KafkaProducer
{
public void SendMessage(string topic, string message)
{
// Configure Kafka producer
var props = new Properties();
props.Put("bootstrap.servers", "localhost:9092");
props.Put("key.serializer", "org.apache.kafka.common.serialization.StringSerializer");
props.Put("value.serializer", "org.apache.kafka.common.serialization.StringSerializer");
// Create producer
var producer = new KafkaProducer(props);
// Send message
var record = new ProducerRecord(topic, message);
producer.Send(record);
producer.Close();
}
}
Platform Support
Operating Systems
- ✅ Windows 10/11
- ✅ Windows Server 2016+
- ✅ Linux (Ubuntu, RHEL, CentOS, Debian)
- ✅ macOS
.NET Versions
- ✅ .NET Framework 4.6.2+
- ✅ .NET 6 (LTS)
- ✅ .NET 8 (LTS)
- ✅ .NET 9
- ✅ .NET 10 (LTS)
Java Versions
- ✅ Java 8 (JRE 1.8.0_161+) 🆕
- ✅ Java 11 (LTS)
- ✅ Java 17 (LTS)
- ✅ Java 21 (LTS)
- ✅ Java 25 (LTS)
JVM Distributions
- ✅ Oracle JDK
- ✅ OpenJDK
- ✅ Amazon Corretto
- ✅ Azul Zulu
- ✅ Eclipse Temurin
- ✅ Red Hat OpenJDK
- ✅ IBM Semeru Runtime
- ✅ And other OpenJDK-based distributions
Common Use Cases
Legacy System Integration
Integrate Java 8 core banking or payment systems with modern .NET cloud applications without migration.
- Avoid $200K-$2M migration costs
- Keep proven, certified systems
- Add cloud/ML capabilities via .NET
Industrial Automation
Bridge Java MES/SCADA systems with .NET Azure IoT and analytics platforms.
- OPC-UA via .NET libraries
- Azure IoT Hub integration
- Real-time dashboards
Event Streaming
Use Apache Kafka from C# with native Java client performance.
- Full Kafka API access
- Kafka Streams in .NET
- Kafka Connect connectors in C#
AI/ML Integration
Add ML.NET models to Java applications, or use Java ML libraries in .NET.
- ML.NET in Java apps
- TensorFlow Java in .NET
- Cross-platform ML pipelines
Lightweight Footprint
Runtime Overhead
For reference tracking and JNI layer
Deployment Size
JCOBridge assemblies/JARs
CPU Usage
~5-10% overhead vs native calls
Ideal for embedded systems: JCOBridge’s minimal footprint makes it perfect for resource-constrained environments like IoT gateways, industrial controllers, and edge computing devices.
Production Proven
Built on the field-proven DLR plugin from the Sinapse platform, JCOBridge guarantees reliable performance in demanding enterprise environments.
Ready to Bridge Java and .NET?
Community Edition free for development. Commercial licenses for production use.


